Chickasaw vs Iroquois In Labor Force | Age 20-24
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Iroquois
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Comparison
Chickasaw
Iroquois
74.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-24
10.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
221st/ 347
METRIC RANK
75.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-24
89.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Iroquois In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,683,013 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123 and weighted average of 74.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,263,763 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.385 and weighted average of 75.6%, a difference of 1.6%.
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Iroquois |
Minimum | 44.1% | 32.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 55.9% | 67.5% |
Mean | 73.9% | 73.8% |
Median | 72.8% | 77.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.8% | 61.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 83.0% | 87.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.2% | 26.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.1% | 18.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.0% | 18.5% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age 20-24
In terms of in labor force | age 20-24, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Norway (74.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Peru (74.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Nepalese (74.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from India (74.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Chilean (74.5%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-24 |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 13.2 /100 | #214 | Poor 74.5% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 12.7 /100 | #215 | Poor 74.5% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 12.7 /100 | #216 | Poor 74.5% |
Chileans | 12.5 /100 | #217 | Poor 74.5% |
Immigrants | Peru | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 74.5% |
Nepalese | 10.5 /100 | #219 | Poor 74.5% |
Immigrants | Norway | 10.3 /100 | #220 | Poor 74.5% |
Chickasaw | 10.3 /100 | #221 | Poor 74.5% |
Immigrants | India | 9.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 74.4% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 7.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 74.4% |
Seminole | 6.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 74.3% |
Ghanaians | 6.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 74.3% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 5.9 /100 | #226 | Tragic 74.3% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 5.8 /100 | #227 | Tragic 74.3% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 5.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 74.2% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by In Labor Force | Age 20-24
In terms of in labor force | age 20-24, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Immigrants from Afghanistan (75.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Austria (75.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Jordan (75.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (75.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and Zimbabwean (75.6%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-24 |
Pakistanis | 94.1 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 75.8% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 94.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 75.8% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 93.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 75.8% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 93.7 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 75.8% |
Brazilians | 93.0 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 75.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 75.7% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 89.4 /100 | #128 | Excellent 75.6% |
Iroquois | 89.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 75.6% |
Immigrants | Austria | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 75.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 88.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 75.6% |
Palestinians | 88.4 /100 | #132 | Excellent 75.6% |
Zimbabweans | 88.2 /100 | #133 | Excellent 75.6% |
Estonians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 75.6% |
Yaqui | 85.5 /100 | #135 | Excellent 75.5% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 75.5% |