Guamanian/Chamorro vs Iroquois Female Poverty
COMPARE
Guamanian/Chamorro
Iroquois
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Guamanians/Chamorros
Iroquois
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
162nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Iroquois Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,860,928 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.792 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,228,109 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.698 and weighted average of 15.8%, a difference of 19.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Guamanian/Chamorro | Iroquois |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 4.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 98.8% | 95.3% |
| Mean | 17.2% | 22.4% |
| Median | 11.7% | 16.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.0% | 12.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.6% | 25.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 13.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.9% | 19.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.6% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Guamanians/Chamorros by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and Scotch-Irish (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Hungarians | 70.1 /100 | #155 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 69.7 /100 | #156 | Good 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 68.8 /100 | #157 | Good 13.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Chickasaw (15.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (15.8%, a difference of 0.37%), Subsaharan African (15.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.76%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |