Chickasaw vs Iroquois Disability
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Iroquois
Disability
Disability Comparison
Chickasaw
Iroquois
15.2%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.8%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Iroquois Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,689,192 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496 and weighted average of 15.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,277,318 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.716 and weighted average of 13.8%, a difference of 9.9%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Iroquois |
| Minimum | 8.6% | 8.7% |
| Maximum | 52.4% | 100.0% |
| Range | 43.9% | 91.3% |
| Mean | 22.5% | 23.3% |
| Median | 20.7% | 19.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.1% | 15.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.7% | 22.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.6% | 16.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.5% | 15.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Iroquois by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Dutch West Indian (14.9%, a difference of 1.8%), Seminole (14.9%, a difference of 2.1%), Cherokee (14.8%, a difference of 2.2%), Tohono O'odham (14.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and Yuman (14.6%, a difference of 3.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Apache (13.9%, a difference of 0.29%), Paiute (13.9%, a difference of 0.42%), American (13.9%, a difference of 0.84%), Comanche (14.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and Chippewa (14.1%, a difference of 2.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 13.8% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 13.9% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 13.9% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 13.9% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.2% |