Bulgarian vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income
COMPARE
Bulgarian
Chickasaw
Per Capita Income
Per Capita Income Comparison
Bulgarians
Chickasaw
$50,906
PER CAPITA INCOME
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
$36,475
PER CAPITA INCOME
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bulgarian vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,631,200 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.181 and weighted average of $50,906. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,726,791 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.505 and weighted average of $36,475, a difference of 39.6%.
Per Capita Income Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bulgarian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | $7,295 | $10,758 |
Maximum | $85,161 | $42,047 |
Range | $77,866 | $31,289 |
Mean | $47,737 | $28,009 |
Median | $47,962 | $27,826 |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | $42,061 | $24,362 |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | $55,182 | $31,977 |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | $13,122 | $7,616 |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | $13,985 | $5,659 |
Standard Deviation (Population) | $13,894 | $5,624 |
Similar Demographics by Per Capita Income
Demographics Similar to Bulgarians by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Immigrants from Latvia ($50,914, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Spain ($50,933, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Europe ($50,950, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Serbia ($50,810, a difference of 0.19%), and New Zealander ($50,575, a difference of 0.65%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional $51,671 |
Immigrants | South Africa | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional $51,465 |
Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional $51,368 |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional $51,361 |
Immigrants | Europe | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional $50,950 |
Immigrants | Spain | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional $50,933 |
Immigrants | Latvia | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional $50,914 |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional $50,906 |
Immigrants | Serbia | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional $50,810 |
New Zealanders | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional $50,575 |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional $50,555 |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional $50,458 |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional $50,417 |
Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional $50,385 |
Immigrants | Belarus | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional $50,303 |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Bahamian ($36,427, a difference of 0.13%), Chippewa ($36,631, a difference of 0.43%), Ute ($36,651, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Honduras ($36,665, a difference of 0.52%), and Fijian ($36,690, a difference of 0.59%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
Inupiat | 0.1 /100 | #305 | Tragic $36,999 |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic $36,849 |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic $36,823 |
Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic $36,690 |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic $36,665 |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic $36,651 |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic $36,631 |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic $36,475 |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic $36,427 |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic $36,180 |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic $36,112 |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic $35,999 |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic $35,922 |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic $35,897 |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic $35,720 |