Bulgarian vs Chickasaw Family Households
COMPARE
Bulgarian
Chickasaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Bulgarians
Chickasaw
63.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
3.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bulgarian vs Chickasaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,566,238 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.106 and weighted average of 63.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 1.3%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bulgarian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 44.3% | 40.0% |
| Maximum | 88.1% | 100.0% |
| Range | 43.8% | 60.0% |
| Mean | 67.6% | 67.1% |
| Median | 67.4% | 67.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.8% | 62.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.5% | 72.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.7% | 10.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.9% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Bulgarians by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Blackfeet (63.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Brazil (63.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Greece (63.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Bahamas (63.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (63.6%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 5.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 63.7% |
| French Canadians | 5.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Turks | 4.5 /100 | #224 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 4.2 /100 | #226 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 4.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Blackfeet | 3.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Bulgarians | 3.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 3.0 /100 | #230 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 2.6 /100 | #232 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 2.6 /100 | #233 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Finns | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Albanians | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Ghanaians | 2.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 63.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
| Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
| Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
| Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
| British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
| Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
| Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
| Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
| Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
| Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
| Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |