Bulgarian vs Pima Male Poverty
COMPARE
Bulgarian
Pima
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Bulgarians
Pima
9.3%
MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.4%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bulgarian vs Pima Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,546,988 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.764 and weighted average of 9.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,538,248 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538 and weighted average of 20.4%, a difference of 118.4%.

Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bulgarian | Pima |
Minimum | 0.33% | 9.2% |
Maximum | 52.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 52.3% | 90.8% |
Mean | 8.0% | 29.7% |
Median | 6.8% | 23.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 14.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 37.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 22.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 21.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 20.7% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bulgarians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (9.3%, a difference of 0.56%), Bolivian (9.4%, a difference of 0.64%), Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.82%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Yup'ik (20.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Lumbee (20.2%, a difference of 0.78%), Immigrants from Yemen (20.1%, a difference of 1.1%), Hopi (20.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and Yuman (19.5%, a difference of 4.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 16.9% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 17.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 17.7% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 18.5% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 18.7% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 19.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 19.5% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 20.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 20.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 20.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 20.4% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 20.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 22.0% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 22.3% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 22.9% |