Bulgarian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Male Poverty
COMPARE
Bulgarian
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Bulgarians
Immigrants from Hong Kong
9.3%
MALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.6%
MALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bulgarian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,546,988 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.764 and weighted average of 9.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,850,467 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.101 and weighted average of 9.6%, a difference of 2.5%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bulgarian | Immigrants from Hong Kong |
| Minimum | 0.33% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 52.6% | 15.8% |
| Range | 52.3% | 14.5% |
| Mean | 8.0% | 8.4% |
| Median | 6.8% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Bulgarians and Immigrants from Hong Kong by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (9.3%, a difference of 0.56%), Bolivian (9.4%, a difference of 0.64%), Immigrants from Bolivia (9.4%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.4%, a difference of 0.82%), and Immigrants from North Macedonia (9.4%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Latvian (9.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Lithuanian (9.5%, a difference of 0.18%), Norwegian (9.5%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Scotland (9.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and Luxembourger (9.5%, a difference of 0.48%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.6% |