Armenian vs Immigrants from India Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Armenian
Immigrants from India
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Armenians
Immigrants from India
18.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
24th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Armenian vs Immigrants from India Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,765,462 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Armenians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.087 and weighted average of 18.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 425,520,068 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from India and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029 and weighted average of 16.8%, a difference of 9.0%.

Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Armenian | Immigrants from India |
Minimum | 6.7% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 60.0% | 35.8% |
Range | 53.3% | 33.8% |
Mean | 18.8% | 15.0% |
Median | 16.5% | 14.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.9% | 11.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.9% | 17.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.1% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.3% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Armenians and Immigrants from India by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Burmese (18.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Asian (18.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from China (18.1%, a difference of 0.98%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from India are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (17.0%, a difference of 0.83%), Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Thai (17.3%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from Iran (17.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and Bhutanese (17.7%, a difference of 5.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |