Cypriot vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia In Labor Force | Age > 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,870,589 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cypriots and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.151 and weighted average of 65.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 499,974,052 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.674 and weighted average of 65.7%, a difference of 0.25%.

In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Cypriot	Immigrants from Eastern Asia
Minimum	45.1%	28.6%
Maximum	80.3%	78.3%
Range	35.2%	49.7%
Mean	63.8%	63.3%
Median	65.3%	64.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	60.1%	61.7%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	67.6%	66.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	7.6%	4.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.7%	6.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.6%	6.7%

Demographics Similar to Cypriots and Immigrants from Eastern Asia by In Labor Force | Age > 16

In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Cypriots are Tlingit-Haida (65.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Romania (65.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Indian (Asian) (65.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Latvian (65.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and Samoan (65.5%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Asia are Ecuadorian (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Korean (65.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Philippines (65.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Guatemala (65.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and Icelander (65.6%, a difference of 0.030%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age > 16
Koreans	95.3 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 65.7%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	94.9 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 65.7%
Ecuadorians	94.7 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Philippines	94.5 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	94.4 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 65.6%
Icelanders	94.3 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	94.1 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	93.5 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 65.6%
Costa Ricans	93.2 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 65.6%
Guatemalans	92.5 /100 \| #135	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Argentina	92.4 /100 \| #136	Exceptional 65.6%
Guamanians/Chamorros	92.4 /100 \| #137	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| West Indies	92.0 /100 \| #138	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	90.8 /100 \| #139	Exceptional 65.5%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	90.8 /100 \| #140	Exceptional 65.5%
Samoans	90.5 /100 \| #141	Exceptional 65.5%
Indians (Asian)	89.5 /100 \| #142	Excellent 65.5%
Latvians	89.4 /100 \| #143	Excellent 65.5%
Immigrants \| Romania	88.6 /100 \| #144	Excellent 65.5%
Tlingit-Haida	88.3 /100 \| #145	Excellent 65.5%
Cypriots	88.2 /100 \| #146	Excellent 65.5%