Macedonian vs Immigrants from Turkey Vision Disability
COMPARE
Macedonian
Immigrants from Turkey
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Macedonians
Immigrants from Turkey
2.0%
VISION DISABILITY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
54th/ 347
METRIC RANK
1.9%
VISION DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Macedonian vs Immigrants from Turkey Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,627,302 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.108 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,977,745 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.608 and weighted average of 1.9%, a difference of 2.5%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Macedonian | Immigrants from Turkey |
| Minimum | 0.17% | 0.99% |
| Maximum | 4.5% | 27.1% |
| Range | 4.4% | 26.1% |
| Mean | 1.9% | 3.6% |
| Median | 1.9% | 1.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.4% | 1.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.2% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.79% | 0.80% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.73% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.73% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Macedonians and Immigrants from Turkey by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Immigrants from Belarus (2.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Serbia (2.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Tongan (2.0%, a difference of 0.46%), Afghan (2.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and Latvian (2.0%, a difference of 0.61%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Turkey are Immigrants from Australia (1.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Cambodian (2.0%, a difference of 0.44%), Bhutanese (2.0%, a difference of 0.69%), Immigrants from Kuwait (2.0%, a difference of 0.73%), and Zimbabwean (2.0%, a difference of 0.79%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.8 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Cambodians | 99.8 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.7 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.7 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Cypriots | 99.7 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 99.7 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.7 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Ethiopians | 99.7 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Israelis | 99.6 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Latvians | 99.5 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Afghans | 99.5 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Tongans | 99.5 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.0% |