Immigrants from Brazil vs Alaska Native Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Brazil
Alaska Native
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Brazil
Alaska Natives
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Brazil vs Alaska Native Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 342,924,003 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,760,957 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.273 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 56.0%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Brazil | Alaska Native |
| Minimum | 0.070% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 9.7% | 18.5% |
| Range | 9.7% | 17.3% |
| Mean | 3.1% | 7.0% |
| Median | 2.9% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 4.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.5% | 8.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.99% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Brazil by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Brazil are Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Alaska Natives by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alaska Natives are Chickasaw (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.4%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.7%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and Navajo (4.6%, a difference of 3.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 5.3% |