Immigrants from Brazil vs Spanish American Indian Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Brazil
Spanish American Indian
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Brazil
Spanish American Indians
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.1%
HEARING DISABILITY
24.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Brazil vs Spanish American Indian Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 342,924,003 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.135 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,148,341 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Spanish American Indians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.308 and weighted average of 3.1%, a difference of 7.0%.

Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Brazil | Spanish American Indian |
Minimum | 0.070% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 9.7% | 8.6% |
Range | 9.7% | 7.1% |
Mean | 3.1% | 3.9% |
Median | 2.9% | 3.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 2.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.5% | 4.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.99% | 1.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.7% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Brazil by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Brazil are Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Spanish American Indians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Spanish American Indians are South African (3.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Europe (3.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Macedonian (3.1%, a difference of 0.35%), Korean (3.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (3.1%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Mexican American Indians | 34.7 /100 | #188 | Fair 3.0% |
Africans | 32.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 3.0% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 31.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 28.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 3.1% |
Koreans | 27.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 3.1% |
Macedonians | 27.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 3.1% |
South Africans | 24.5 /100 | #194 | Fair 3.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 24.1 /100 | #195 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 22.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 3.1% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 20.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 3.1% |
Syrians | 19.2 /100 | #199 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 19.1 /100 | #200 | Poor 3.1% |
Iraqis | 19.0 /100 | #201 | Poor 3.1% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 16.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 3.1% |