Tlingit-Haida vs Tohono O'odham Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Tohono O'odham
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Tohono O'odham
4.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida vs Tohono O'odham Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,852,790 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.567 and weighted average of 4.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,715,422 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.552 and weighted average of 4.2%, a difference of 16.3%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tlingit-Haida | Tohono O'odham |
| Minimum | 0.61% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 17.5% | 17.5% |
| Range | 16.9% | 15.1% |
| Mean | 8.3% | 7.3% |
| Median | 7.5% | 6.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.4% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida and Tohono O'odham by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Inupiat (4.7%, a difference of 2.7%), Tsimshian (4.7%, a difference of 2.9%), Navajo (4.6%, a difference of 4.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 6.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Crow (4.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Arapaho (4.1%, a difference of 0.38%), Native/Alaskan (4.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Cherokee (4.2%, a difference of 0.95%), and Potawatomi (4.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 4.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 5.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 5.3% |