Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Yugoslavian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Yugoslavian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Hong Kong
Yugoslavians
10.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.6%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
73.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Yugoslavian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,546,344 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.024 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 258,600,754 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.024 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 20.8%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Hong Kong | Yugoslavian |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 2.3% |
| Maximum | 33.3% | 66.7% |
| Range | 31.4% | 64.4% |
| Mean | 10.3% | 15.4% |
| Median | 9.8% | 12.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.8% | 7.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 17.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 12.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 12.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Tongan (10.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from India (10.3%, a difference of 0.97%), Immigrants from Taiwan (10.3%, a difference of 1.7%), Filipino (10.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and Afghan (10.7%, a difference of 2.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.7% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Malaysian (12.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Lebanon (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Native Hawaiian (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Sierra Leonean (12.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and Hawaiian (12.6%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Okinawans | 75.9 /100 | #141 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 75.9 /100 | #142 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #143 | Good 12.6% |
| Hawaiians | 75.1 /100 | #144 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 75.0 /100 | #145 | Good 12.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 75.0 /100 | #146 | Good 12.6% |
| Malaysians | 74.8 /100 | #147 | Good 12.6% |
| Yugoslavians | 73.9 /100 | #148 | Good 12.6% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 73.0 /100 | #149 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 72.1 /100 | #150 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 71.9 /100 | #151 | Good 12.6% |
| Australians | 71.4 /100 | #152 | Good 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 70.1 /100 | #153 | Good 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 68.9 /100 | #154 | Good 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 68.7 /100 | #155 | Good 12.7% |