Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from Eritrea Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,302,562 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eritrea within Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.276. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Puget Sound Salish within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Immigrants from Eritrea. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Puget Sound Salish corresponds to a decrease of 6.9 Immigrants from Eritrea.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 18.2%), householder income under 25 years ($55,543 compared to $51,574, a difference of 7.7%), and per capita income ($41,495 compared to $44,509, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($53,704 compared to $53,715, a difference of 0.020%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,661 compared to $93,466, a difference of 0.21%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,934 compared to $60,096, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 21.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 21.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 2.4%), single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 30.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 23.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.65%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.1% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (47.4% compared to 42.1%, a difference of 12.7%), divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.1%), and currently married (47.6% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.17 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 60.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 47.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 1.2%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 11.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 76.0%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 57.0%), and no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.0%), ged/equivalency (85.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 46.3%), male disability (13.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 30.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 4.5%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.3%).