Hawaiian vs Scottish Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Hawaiian
Scottish
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Hawaiians
Scottish
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
62.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hawaiian vs Scottish Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,605,449 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.198 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 552,662,179 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.687 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 20.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hawaiian | Scottish |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 27.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 26.0% | 97.4% |
| Mean | 6.1% | 18.6% |
| Median | 5.0% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.8% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.4% | 22.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.6% | 16.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 22.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 22.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Hawaiians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hawaiians are Immigrants from Malaysia (5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Paraguayan (5.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Costa Rican (5.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Sierra Leonean (5.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.55%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Argentineans | 70.7 /100 | #157 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 70.4 /100 | #158 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 70.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.1% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 68.5 /100 | #160 | Good 5.1% |
| Ethiopians | 68.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 66.5 /100 | #162 | Good 5.1% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 64.1 /100 | #163 | Good 5.1% |
| Hawaiians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 62.2 /100 | #165 | Good 5.1% |
| Paraguayans | 61.5 /100 | #166 | Good 5.1% |
| Costa Ricans | 61.5 /100 | #167 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 5.2% |
| Ottawa | 54.5 /100 | #169 | Average 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 54.4 /100 | #170 | Average 5.2% |
| Bermudans | 52.9 /100 | #171 | Average 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Scottish by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Northern European (4.3%, a difference of 0.16%), French Canadian (4.2%, a difference of 0.41%), Swiss (4.3%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Northern Europe (4.2%, a difference of 0.70%), and Immigrants from Japan (4.3%, a difference of 0.81%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| English | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Iranians | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| French Canadians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |