Chinese vs Pakistani Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
COMPARE
Chinese
Pakistani
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Comparison
Chinese
Pakistanis
9.1%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 75
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.8%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 75
84.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Pakistani Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,532,572 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.133 and weighted average of 9.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 332,247,947 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis and poverty level among seniors over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.341 and weighted average of 11.8%, a difference of 29.9%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Pakistani |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 3.3% |
| Maximum | 21.6% | 60.0% |
| Range | 19.9% | 56.7% |
| Mean | 8.7% | 15.1% |
| Median | 8.6% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 9.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.3% | 15.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 11.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 11.0% |
Similar Demographics by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Tlingit-Haida (9.7%, a difference of 7.0%), Native Hawaiian (10.1%, a difference of 11.1%), Swedish (10.2%, a difference of 12.0%), Norwegian (10.2%, a difference of 12.4%), and Danish (10.2%, a difference of 12.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Germans | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| English | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | India | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Croatians | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Scottish | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Demographics Similar to Pakistanis by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75, the demographic groups most similar to Pakistanis are Immigrants from Italy (11.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Malaysian (11.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Fijian (11.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Sudanese (11.8%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Nepal (11.8%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 75 |
| New Zealanders | 86.3 /100 | #115 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Iraqis | 86.3 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Icelanders | 85.7 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 85.5 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 84.8 /100 | #119 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 84.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Malaysians | 84.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Pakistanis | 84.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 84.0 /100 | #123 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Fijians | 83.8 /100 | #124 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.6 /100 | #125 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 83.4 /100 | #126 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 82.6 /100 | #127 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 81.7 /100 | #128 | Excellent 11.8% |
| Ethiopians | 80.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 11.8% |