Cambodian vs Immigrants from Hungary Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 77,591,658 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hungary within Cambodian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.686. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cambodians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.080% in Immigrants from Hungary. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cambodians corresponds to an increase of 80.2 Immigrants from Hungary.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($45,014 compared to $41,820, a difference of 7.6%), median earnings ($53,386 compared to $50,227, a difference of 6.3%), and median family income ($117,780 compared to $111,378, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($66,892 compared to $64,277, a difference of 4.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,148 compared to $102,655, a difference of 4.4%), and median male earnings ($62,516 compared to $59,806, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 14.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 10.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.47%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 21.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 18.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.75%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.0% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.1% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.7% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 11.5%), divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.48%), family households with children (26.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 0.22%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.3% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.3%), master's degree (20.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 14.0%), and bachelor's degree (47.2% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.0%), 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and 2nd grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cambodian and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 18.6%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.7%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 0.020%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.2%).