Turkish vs Subsaharan African No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Turkish
Subsaharan African
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Turks
Sub-Saharan Africans
11.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
2.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
261st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Subsaharan African No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,510,878 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.061 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 506,014,655 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.345 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 4.5%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Subsaharan African |
| Minimum | 0.69% | 2.7% |
| Maximum | 21.1% | 37.8% |
| Range | 20.4% | 35.0% |
| Mean | 8.0% | 14.2% |
| Median | 7.1% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Sub-Saharan Africans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Eastern European (11.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Cheyenne (11.7%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Portugal (11.7%, a difference of 0.51%), Immigrants from Honduras (11.8%, a difference of 0.70%), and Menominee (11.8%, a difference of 0.87%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Macedonian (12.2%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Latvia (12.1%, a difference of 0.95%), South American Indian (12.1%, a difference of 1.2%), Nigerian (12.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and Liberian (12.0%, a difference of 2.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Eastern Europeans | 2.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Turks | 2.6 /100 | #242 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Cheyenne | 2.4 /100 | #243 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 2.2 /100 | #244 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Menominee | 2.0 /100 | #246 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 2.0 /100 | #247 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 1.9 /100 | #248 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #249 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Paiute | 1.8 /100 | #250 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 1.6 /100 | #251 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 1.5 /100 | #252 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Egyptians | 1.4 /100 | #253 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 1.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 11.9% |
| Hondurans | 1.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Liberians | 1.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.0% |
| Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #257 | Tragic 12.1% |
| South American Indians | 0.9 /100 | #258 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 0.8 /100 | #259 | Tragic 12.1% |
| Macedonians | 0.7 /100 | #260 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.6 /100 | #261 | Tragic 12.2% |