Turkish vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Turkish
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Turks
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
11.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
2.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
242nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
82.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,510,878 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.061 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,693,810 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.484 and weighted average of 9.9%, a difference of 18.5%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Minimum | 0.69% | 0.74% |
| Maximum | 21.1% | 37.5% |
| Range | 20.4% | 36.8% |
| Mean | 8.0% | 7.2% |
| Median | 7.1% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.9% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.1% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 6.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 6.1% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Turks by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Eastern European (11.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants (11.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Taiwanese (11.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Cheyenne (11.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Portugal (11.7%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Kiowa | 4.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 11.5% |
| Cree | 3.5 /100 | #236 | Tragic 11.6% |
| Ute | 3.3 /100 | #237 | Tragic 11.6% |
| Russians | 3.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 11.6% |
| Taiwanese | 2.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 2.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Eastern Europeans | 2.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Turks | 2.6 /100 | #242 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Cheyenne | 2.4 /100 | #243 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 2.2 /100 | #244 | Tragic 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Menominee | 2.0 /100 | #246 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 2.0 /100 | #247 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 1.9 /100 | #248 | Tragic 11.8% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #249 | Tragic 11.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Sudanese (9.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.35%), Chilean (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Bahamas (9.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 81.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Bahamians | 81.0 /100 | #145 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Hungarians | 80.0 /100 | #146 | Excellent 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 79.8 /100 | #147 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 79.1 /100 | #148 | Good 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 76.1 /100 | #149 | Good 10.0% |