Turkish vs Chickasaw Receiving Food Stamps
COMPARE
Turkish
Chickasaw
Receiving Food Stamps
Receiving Food Stamps Comparison
Turks
Chickasaw
9.5%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
RECEIVING FOOD STAMPS
3.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
226th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Chickasaw Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,161,413 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,564,346 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population receiving government assistance and/or food stamps in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.329 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 38.1%.
Receiving Food Stamps Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.2% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 16.7% | 32.8% |
Range | 15.5% | 30.3% |
Mean | 7.6% | 15.0% |
Median | 7.1% | 14.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 12.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.3% | 17.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 5.0% |
Similar Demographics by Receiving Food Stamps
Demographics Similar to Turks by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Zimbabwean (9.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Austria (9.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Estonian (9.5%, a difference of 0.050%), European (9.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (9.5%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Bolivians | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Zimbabweans | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Turks | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Austria | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Estonians | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Europeans | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Cambodians | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Receiving Food Stamps
In terms of receiving food stamps, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Nigerian (13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Panamanian (13.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Puget Sound Salish (13.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (13.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Receiving Food Stamps |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 5.4 /100 | #219 | Tragic 12.9% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 5.3 /100 | #220 | Tragic 12.9% |
Bermudans | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.4 /100 | #222 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Albania | 4.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 4.3 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.0% |
Fijians | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 13.0% |
Chickasaw | 3.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.1% |
Nigerians | 3.5 /100 | #227 | Tragic 13.1% |
Panamanians | 3.5 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ottawa | 3.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.1% |
Puget Sound Salish | 3.4 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 3.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.1% |
Salvadorans | 2.7 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.2% |
Cherokee | 2.5 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.2% |