Comanche vs Lumbee No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Comanche
 Lumbee
 No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Comanche
Lumbee
10.2%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
60.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.3%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
54.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
169th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Comanche vs Lumbee No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,677,271 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Comanche and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.146 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,166,207 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.206 and weighted average of 10.3%, a difference of 0.86%.
 
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Comanche | Lumbee | 
| Minimum | 1.3% | 2.0% | 
| Maximum | 15.8% | 28.8% | 
| Range | 14.5% | 26.8% | 
| Mean | 7.1% | 10.3% | 
| Median | 5.6% | 9.1% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 7.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.0% | 13.1% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 5.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 5.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 5.0% | 
Demographics Similar to Comanche and Lumbee by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are South African (10.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (10.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (10.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Cambodia (10.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Austria (10.2%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Immigrants from Latin America (10.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Indonesian (10.3%, a difference of 0.27%), Hmong (10.4%, a difference of 0.28%), Brazilian (10.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (10.3%, a difference of 0.56%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household | 
| Australians | 70.6 /100 | #157 | Good 10.1% | 
| Spanish American Indians | 70.2 /100 | #158 | Good 10.1% | 
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 69.3 /100 | #159 | Good 10.1% | 
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 65.7 /100 | #160 | Good 10.2% | 
| New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% | 
| Immigrants | Austria | 64.4 /100 | #162 | Good 10.2% | 
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 63.7 /100 | #163 | Good 10.2% | 
| South Africans | 61.1 /100 | #164 | Good 10.2% | 
| Comanche | 60.8 /100 | #165 | Good 10.2% | 
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 60.5 /100 | #166 | Good 10.3% | 
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 58.8 /100 | #167 | Average 10.3% | 
| Indonesians | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 10.3% | 
| Lumbee | 54.7 /100 | #169 | Average 10.3% | 
| Immigrants | Latin America | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 10.4% | 
| Hmong | 52.7 /100 | #171 | Average 10.4% | 
| Brazilians | 51.7 /100 | #172 | Average 10.4% | 
| Filipinos | 50.1 /100 | #173 | Average 10.4% | 
| Immigrants | Sudan | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 10.4% | 
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 49.1 /100 | #175 | Average 10.4% | 
| French American Indians | 49.1 /100 | #176 | Average 10.4% | 
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 49.1 /100 | #177 | Average 10.4% |