Comanche vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Comanche
 Chickasaw
 In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Comparison
Comanche
Chickasaw
77.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
76.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Comanche vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,783,732 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.628 and weighted average of 77.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,722,293 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.269 and weighted average of 76.2%, a difference of 1.1%.
 
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Comanche | Chickasaw | 
| Minimum | 52.9% | 38.5% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 87.5% | 
| Range | 47.1% | 49.0% | 
| Mean | 74.7% | 69.2% | 
| Median | 73.0% | 70.5% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 68.6% | 65.8% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 76.8% | 75.9% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 10.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 9.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.7% | 9.4% | 
Demographics Similar to Comanche and Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Alaska Native (77.0%, a difference of 0.020%), American (77.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Blackfeet (77.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Central American Indian (77.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Alaskan Athabascan (76.9%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Cherokee (76.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Inupiat (76.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Yaqui (76.5%, a difference of 0.44%), Yakama (75.8%, a difference of 0.55%), and Ottawa (76.7%, a difference of 0.63%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | 
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 77.3% | 
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 77.2% | 
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 77.2% | 
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 77.1% | 
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 77.0% | 
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 77.0% | 
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 77.0% | 
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 77.0% | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 76.9% | 
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 76.8% | 
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 76.8% | 
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 76.7% | 
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 76.5% | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 76.2% | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 76.2% | 
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 76.1% | 
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 75.8% | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 75.5% | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 75.5% | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 75.5% | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 75.4% |