Chinese vs Osage Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
 Osage
 Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Chinese
Osage
9.5%
POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.6%
POVERTY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Osage Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 9.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,797,306 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.161 and weighted average of 13.6%, a difference of 42.1%.
 
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Osage | 
| Minimum | 3.4% | 2.8% | 
| Maximum | 26.1% | 28.9% | 
| Range | 22.7% | 26.1% | 
| Mean | 10.2% | 13.8% | 
| Median | 9.6% | 13.1% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 10.9% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.6% | 15.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 4.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 5.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 5.1% | 
Similar Demographics by Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (9.6%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Taiwan (9.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Immigrants from Ireland (10.1%, a difference of 5.6%), Immigrants from India (9.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 5.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty | 
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1  | Exceptional 9.0%  | 
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2  | Exceptional 9.5%  | 
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3  | Exceptional 9.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4  | Exceptional 9.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5  | Exceptional 10.1%  | 
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6  | Exceptional 10.1%  | 
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7  | Exceptional 10.1%  | 
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8  | Exceptional 10.2%  | 
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9  | Exceptional 10.2%  | 
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10  | Exceptional 10.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11  | Exceptional 10.3%  | 
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12  | Exceptional 10.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13  | Exceptional 10.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14  | Exceptional 10.4%  | 
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15  | Exceptional 10.4%  | 
Demographics Similar to Osage by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Alaskan Athabascan (13.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Nigerian (13.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Nigeria (13.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Alaska Native (13.5%, a difference of 0.69%), and Marshallese (13.4%, a difference of 0.85%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty | 
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.6 /100 | #222  | Tragic 13.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Africa | 2.5 /100 | #223  | Tragic 13.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 2.4 /100 | #224  | Tragic 13.4%  | 
| German Russians | 2.2 /100 | #225  | Tragic 13.4%  | 
| Marshallese | 2.2 /100 | #226  | Tragic 13.4%  | 
| Alaska Natives | 2.1 /100 | #227  | Tragic 13.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.7 /100 | #228  | Tragic 13.5%  | 
| Osage | 1.5 /100 | #229  | Tragic 13.6%  | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 1.5 /100 | #230  | Tragic 13.6%  | 
| Nigerians | 1.4 /100 | #231  | Tragic 13.6%  | 
| Fijians | 0.8 /100 | #232  | Tragic 13.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 0.8 /100 | #233  | Tragic 13.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.7 /100 | #234  | Tragic 13.8%  | 
| Cubans | 0.6 /100 | #235  | Tragic 13.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Armenia | 0.5 /100 | #236  | Tragic 13.9%  |