Kiowa vs Nicaraguan Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Kiowa
Nicaraguan
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Kiowa
Nicaraguans
6.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
297th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
299th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kiowa vs Nicaraguan Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,003,088 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.339 and weighted average of 6.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 284,450,167 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.350 and weighted average of 6.7%, a difference of 0.61%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Kiowa | Nicaraguan |
| Minimum | 3.4% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 17.1% | 20.2% |
| Range | 13.7% | 18.5% |
| Mean | 8.0% | 8.0% |
| Median | 7.1% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 9.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Kiowa and Nicaraguans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are U.S. Virgin Islander (6.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Guyana (6.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (6.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Bahamian (6.6%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Belize (6.7%, a difference of 0.76%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Immigrants from Belize (6.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Guyana (6.7%, a difference of 0.55%), U.S. Virgin Islander (6.6%, a difference of 0.62%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (6.6%, a difference of 0.73%), and Central American (6.7%, a difference of 0.75%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.6% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Cubans | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 7.0% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 7.1% |