Kiowa vs British Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Kiowa
British
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Kiowa
British
6.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
297th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Kiowa vs British Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,003,088 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.339 and weighted average of 6.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 521,525,466 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.567 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 54.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Kiowa | British |
| Minimum | 3.4% | 2.4% |
| Maximum | 17.1% | 50.0% |
| Range | 13.7% | 47.6% |
| Mean | 8.0% | 11.5% |
| Median | 7.1% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.4% | 12.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 8.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 11.2% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Kiowa by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are U.S. Virgin Islander (6.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Guyana (6.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (6.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Bahamian (6.6%, a difference of 0.40%), and Nicaraguan (6.7%, a difference of 0.61%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.6% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 6.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 6.8% |
| Cubans | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to British by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to British are Serbian (4.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Japan (4.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| French Canadians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |