Iranian vs Celtic Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Iranian
Celtic
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Iranians
Celtics
18.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
22.7%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iranian vs Celtic Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 312,309,917 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iranians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.024 and weighted average of 18.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,592,415 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.360 and weighted average of 22.7%, a difference of 26.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iranian | Celtic |
| Minimum | 3.3% | 11.1% |
| Maximum | 41.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 38.0% | 88.9% |
| Mean | 18.1% | 33.1% |
| Median | 16.7% | 27.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.7% | 22.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.1% | 39.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 17.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.1% | 16.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.0% | 16.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Iranians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Indian (Asian) (17.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Korea (18.1%, a difference of 0.60%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.75%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (18.1%, a difference of 0.88%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Sudanese (22.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and British West Indian (22.8%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |