Iranian vs Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Iranian
Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Iranians
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs
18.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
16th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iranian vs Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 312,309,917 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iranians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.024 and weighted average of 18.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,756,092 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.090 and weighted average of 17.0%, a difference of 6.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Iranian | Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac |
Minimum | 3.3% | 2.7% |
Maximum | 41.3% | 45.3% |
Range | 38.0% | 42.5% |
Mean | 18.1% | 15.7% |
Median | 16.7% | 15.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.7% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.1% | 19.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.1% | 7.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.0% | 7.3% |
Demographics Similar to Iranians and Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Indian (Asian) (17.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from Korea (18.1%, a difference of 0.60%), Immigrants from Bolivia (17.8%, a difference of 0.75%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (18.1%, a difference of 0.88%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs are Filipino (17.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from India (16.8%, a difference of 0.83%), Thai (17.3%, a difference of 1.9%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (16.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and Immigrants from Iran (17.5%, a difference of 3.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 16.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 16.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 16.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 16.8% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 17.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |