Latvian vs Pima Female Poverty
COMPARE
Latvian
Pima
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Latvians
Pima
11.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Pima Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,618,449 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.166 and weighted average of 11.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,538,212 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.588 and weighted average of 23.6%, a difference of 106.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Latvian | Pima |
| Minimum | 0.50% | 5.7% |
| Maximum | 31.3% | 79.5% |
| Range | 30.8% | 73.8% |
| Mean | 10.2% | 28.6% |
| Median | 9.6% | 24.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 37.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 19.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 16.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 15.8% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Latvians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Lithuanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Bolivia (11.5%, a difference of 0.47%), Bolivian (11.5%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from Scotland (11.5%, a difference of 0.59%), and Norwegian (11.5%, a difference of 0.64%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Pima by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Lumbee (23.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Navajo (23.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Yemen (22.8%, a difference of 3.3%), Crow (22.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and Puerto Rican (25.2%, a difference of 6.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.9% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.0% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 25.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 25.9% |