Comanche vs Haitian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Comanche
Haitian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Comanche
Haitians
16.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
285th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Comanche vs Haitian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,749,855 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.443 and weighted average of 16.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 287,638,574 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Haitians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.397 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 1.4%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Comanche | Haitian |
Minimum | 8.4% | 6.9% |
Maximum | 60.0% | 26.6% |
Range | 51.6% | 19.6% |
Mean | 20.0% | 16.7% |
Median | 17.4% | 15.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.3% | 14.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.9% | 19.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Comanche and Haitians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Spanish American (16.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Cuba (16.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Haiti (16.1%, a difference of 0.21%), West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and Vietnamese (16.1%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Haitians are Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Barbados (16.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Central American (16.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.2% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 16.2% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 16.3% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 16.4% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 16.4% |