Comanche vs Immigrants from Barbados Female Poverty
COMPARE
Comanche
Immigrants from Barbados
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Comanche
Immigrants from Barbados
16.2%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
285th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
275th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Comanche vs Immigrants from Barbados Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,749,855 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.443 and weighted average of 16.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,761,871 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Barbados and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.130 and weighted average of 16.0%, a difference of 1.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Comanche | Immigrants from Barbados |
| Minimum | 8.4% | 0.50% |
| Maximum | 60.0% | 33.6% |
| Range | 51.6% | 33.1% |
| Mean | 20.0% | 14.4% |
| Median | 17.4% | 14.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.3% | 11.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.9% | 17.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Comanche and Immigrants from Barbados by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Spanish American (16.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Cuba (16.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Haiti (16.1%, a difference of 0.21%), West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and Vietnamese (16.1%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Barbados are Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Central American (16.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 16.4% |