Chinese vs Immigrants from Singapore Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
Immigrants from Singapore
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Chinese
Immigrants from Singapore
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Immigrants from Singapore Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 137,322,674 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Singapore and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.114 and weighted average of 7.1%, a difference of 9.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Immigrants from Singapore |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.70% |
| Maximum | 19.1% | 15.7% |
| Range | 17.8% | 15.0% |
| Mean | 6.8% | 6.2% |
| Median | 6.3% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.0% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 3.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Immigrants from Singapore by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from India (6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Singapore are Bulgarian (7.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Latvian (7.1%, a difference of 0.27%), Maltese (7.1%, a difference of 0.29%), Swedish (7.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Iranian (7.1%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |