Immigrants from Belarus vs South African Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Belarus
South African
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Belarus
South Africans
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
86.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Belarus vs South African Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,164,106 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.074 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,517,352 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.864 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 0.71%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Belarus | South African |
| Minimum | 0.12% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 26.1% | 75.0% |
| Range | 25.9% | 73.0% |
| Mean | 10.6% | 9.9% |
| Median | 9.5% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.5% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.5% | 14.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 13.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belarus and South Africans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Immigrants from Vietnam (10.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Pakistani (10.8%, a difference of 0.060%), New Zealander (10.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Chilean (10.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and Brazilian (10.8%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are French (10.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Native Hawaiian (10.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Peruvian (10.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from China (10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Hungary (10.7%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.1 /100 | #117 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Okinawans | 87.6 /100 | #118 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 87.6 /100 | #119 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 87.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Peruvians | 87.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 87.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.7% |
| South Africans | 86.8 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.7% |
| French | 86.7 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 86.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 84.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 84.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |