Immigrants from Turkey vs South African Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Turkey
South African
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Turkey
South Africans
10.6%
MALE POVERTY
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
112th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
86.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Turkey vs South African Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,940,059 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.597 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,517,352 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.864 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 0.66%.

Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Turkey | South African |
Minimum | 4.4% | 2.0% |
Maximum | 80.0% | 75.0% |
Range | 75.6% | 73.0% |
Mean | 13.2% | 9.9% |
Median | 8.7% | 7.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 3.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 9.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.2% | 14.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.8% | 13.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Turkey and South Africans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Turkey are Immigrants from Argentina (10.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Palestinian (10.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Brazil (10.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Argentinean (10.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Russia (10.6%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are French (10.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Native Hawaiian (10.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Peruvian (10.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from China (10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Hungary (10.7%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Laotians | 91.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Portuguese | 91.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Albanians | 90.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Argentineans | 90.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 89.8 /100 | #111 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 89.5 /100 | #112 | Excellent 10.6% |
Palestinians | 89.1 /100 | #113 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 89.0 /100 | #114 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | Russia | 88.6 /100 | #115 | Excellent 10.6% |
Sri Lankans | 88.1 /100 | #116 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.1 /100 | #117 | Excellent 10.6% |
Okinawans | 87.6 /100 | #118 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 87.6 /100 | #119 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | China | 87.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.7% |
Peruvians | 87.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.7% |
Native Hawaiians | 87.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.7% |
South Africans | 86.8 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.7% |
French | 86.7 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 86.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 84.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 84.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.7% |