Yugoslavian vs South African Male Poverty
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
South African
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Yugoslavians
South Africans
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
78.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
138th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
86.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs South African Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,576,958 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,517,352 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of South Africans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.864 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 1.6%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yugoslavian | South African |
| Minimum | 0.59% | 2.0% |
| Maximum | 26.2% | 75.0% |
| Range | 25.6% | 73.0% |
| Mean | 9.3% | 9.9% |
| Median | 8.9% | 7.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 14.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 13.8% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians and South Africans by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Jordan (10.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Switzerland (10.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Tlingit-Haida (10.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Israel (10.8%, a difference of 0.42%), and Brazilian (10.8%, a difference of 0.72%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are French (10.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Native Hawaiian (10.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Peruvian (10.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from China (10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Norway (10.7%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | China | 87.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Peruvians | 87.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 87.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.7% |
| South Africans | 86.8 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.7% |
| French | 86.7 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 86.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 84.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 84.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |