Immigrants from Croatia vs Immigrants from Romania Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Croatia
Immigrants from Romania
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Croatia
Immigrants from Romania
12.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Croatia vs Immigrants from Romania Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,555,435 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Croatia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.033 and weighted average of 12.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,918,121 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.054 and weighted average of 12.0%, a difference of 0.54%.

Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Croatia | Immigrants from Romania |
Minimum | 1.3% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 20.0% | 31.2% |
Range | 18.7% | 29.7% |
Mean | 9.7% | 11.5% |
Median | 10.3% | 10.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 14.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Romania by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Croatia are Immigrants from Austria (12.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Philippines (12.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (12.0%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (12.1%, a difference of 0.50%), and Slovene (12.0%, a difference of 0.52%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are Slovene (12.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Japan (11.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (12.0%, a difference of 0.23%), Asian (11.9%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Austria (12.0%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Koreans | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Tongans | 99.2 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.2 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Turks | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Asians | 99.1 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Slovenes | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 98.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 98.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 98.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Estonians | 98.3 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 98.3 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Scandinavians | 98.2 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 98.2 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 98.1 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 12.2% |