Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Romania Wage/Income Gap
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Romania
Wage/Income Gap
Wage/Income Gap Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Romania
27.2%
WAGE/INCOME GAP
3.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.0%
WAGE/INCOME GAP
4.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Romania Wage/Income Gap Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,661,645 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.319 and weighted average of 27.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,953,227 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.082 and weighted average of 27.0%, a difference of 0.51%.
Wage/Income Gap Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Romania |
| Minimum | 2.8% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 60.4% | 59.4% |
| Range | 57.6% | 55.4% |
| Mean | 29.3% | 29.0% |
| Median | 28.3% | 28.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.5% | 24.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 36.6% | 33.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.2% | 9.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.2% | 10.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.2% | 10.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from Romania by Wage/Income Gap
In terms of wage/income gap, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from the Azores (27.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Spanish (27.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (27.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Nonimmigrants (27.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Creek (27.1%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are Immigrants from Hungary (27.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Pakistan (27.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Brazil (27.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Argentinean (27.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (27.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Wage/Income Gap |
| Ottawa | 5.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Bhutanese | 5.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Argentineans | 5.2 /100 | #232 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 5.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 4.9 /100 | #234 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 4.8 /100 | #235 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 4.8 /100 | #236 | Tragic 27.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 4.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Osage | 4.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Estonians | 4.3 /100 | #239 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 3.8 /100 | #240 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Creek | 3.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 3.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Spanish | 3.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 27.1% |
| Chickasaw | 3.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 3.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Celtics | 2.8 /100 | #247 | Tragic 27.3% |
| Cypriots | 2.8 /100 | #248 | Tragic 27.3% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 2.7 /100 | #249 | Tragic 27.3% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 2.7 /100 | #250 | Tragic 27.3% |