Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Cherokee Family Poverty
COMPARE
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Cherokee
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
Cherokee
10.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Cherokee Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,444,154 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.258 and weighted average of 10.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 492,113,161 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 3.3%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Cherokee |
Minimum | 0.64% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 22.8% | 50.0% |
Range | 22.2% | 47.1% |
Mean | 10.1% | 15.7% |
Median | 9.9% | 13.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.8% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.2% | 17.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 8.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians and Cherokee by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Cape Verdean (10.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (10.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Spanish American Indian (10.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Shoshone (10.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and Bangladeshi (10.9%, a difference of 0.44%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Liberian (10.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Nicaraguan (10.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Cuban (10.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (10.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and Salvadoran (10.7%, a difference of 0.87%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 10.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 10.9% |
Bangladeshis | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 10.9% |
Shoshone | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 10.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 10.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 10.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 10.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 10.9% |