Cuban vs Cherokee Family Poverty
COMPARE
Cuban
Cherokee
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Cubans
Cherokee
10.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs Cherokee Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 447,916,186 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cubans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.004 and weighted average of 10.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 492,113,161 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 0.34%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cuban | Cherokee |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 28.4% | 50.0% |
| Range | 26.2% | 47.1% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 15.7% |
| Median | 10.3% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 17.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Cubans and Cherokee by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Nicaraguan (10.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Liberian (10.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Salvadoran (10.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Iroquois (10.7%, a difference of 0.81%), and Immigrants from Zaire (10.7%, a difference of 0.93%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Liberian (10.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Nicaraguan (10.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (10.5%, a difference of 0.64%), Salvadoran (10.7%, a difference of 0.87%), and Iroquois (10.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Laos | 1.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 10.2% |
| French American Indians | 1.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
| Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
| Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
| Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
| Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 10.7% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 10.8% |