Immigrants from Nigeria vs Cherokee Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nigeria
Cherokee
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Nigeria
Cherokee
10.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
1.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.6%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Cherokee Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,018,314 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nigeria and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.073 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 492,113,161 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.408 and weighted average of 10.6%, a difference of 4.2%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Nigeria | Cherokee |
Minimum | 1.2% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 22.6% | 50.0% |
Range | 21.4% | 47.1% |
Mean | 9.8% | 15.7% |
Median | 9.2% | 13.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.0% | 17.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 8.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nigeria and Cherokee by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nigeria are Nigerian (10.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Laos (10.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (10.1%, a difference of 0.28%), Fijian (10.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and French American Indian (10.2%, a difference of 0.63%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Liberian (10.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Nicaraguan (10.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Cuban (10.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (10.5%, a difference of 0.64%), and Salvadoran (10.7%, a difference of 0.87%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 2.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 10.1% |
Fijians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 2.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 10.1% |
Nigerians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 1.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 10.2% |
French American Indians | 1.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 10.2% |
Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 10.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 10.5% |
Cherokee | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 10.6% |
Liberians | 0.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 10.6% |
Nicaraguans | 0.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 10.6% |
Cubans | 0.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 10.6% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 10.7% |
Iroquois | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 10.7% |