Chickasaw vs Cherokee 10th Grade
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Cherokee
10th Grade
10th Grade Comparison
Chickasaw
Cherokee
94.1%
10TH GRADE
82.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
94.1%
10TH GRADE
84.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Cherokee 10th Grade Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,726,831 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with at least 10th grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.266 and weighted average of 94.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,720,058 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of population with at least 10th grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015 and weighted average of 94.1%, a difference of 0.040%.
10th Grade Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Cherokee |
| Minimum | 87.7% | 79.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 12.3% | 20.8% |
| Mean | 94.3% | 94.8% |
| Median | 94.6% | 94.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 92.7% | 93.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 95.7% | 96.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.7% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Cherokee by 10th Grade
In terms of 10th grade, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Nonimmigrants (94.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ukraine (94.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Arab (94.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Ugandan (94.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (94.1%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (94.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Nonimmigrants (94.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Hmong (94.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Albanian (94.1%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Jordan (94.1%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | 10th Grade |
| Osage | 91.7 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 94.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 91.3 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 94.2% |
| Shoshone | 90.8 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 94.2% |
| Arapaho | 90.5 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 94.2% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 89.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 94.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 89.4 /100 | #139 | Excellent 94.2% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 87.6 /100 | #140 | Excellent 94.1% |
| Hmong | 86.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 94.1% |
| Albanians | 86.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 94.1% |
| Cherokee | 84.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 94.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 94.1% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 83.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 94.1% |
| Chickasaw | 82.6 /100 | #146 | Excellent 94.1% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 81.5 /100 | #147 | Excellent 94.0% |
| Arabs | 80.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 94.0% |
| Ugandans | 80.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 94.0% |
| Egyptians | 79.6 /100 | #150 | Good 94.0% |
| Kenyans | 79.1 /100 | #151 | Good 94.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 78.0 /100 | #152 | Good 94.0% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 94.0% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 75.3 /100 | #154 | Good 94.0% |