Immigrants from Denmark vs Ugandan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Denmark
Ugandan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Denmark
Ugandans
20.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
80.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
64.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Denmark vs Ugandan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 135,190,305 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Denmark and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.494 and weighted average of 20.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,803,349 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 20.8%, a difference of 1.3%.

Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Denmark | Ugandan |
Minimum | 5.3% | 5.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 94.7% | 94.5% |
Mean | 30.0% | 23.7% |
Median | 22.5% | 20.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.7% | 16.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.3% | 25.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.6% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.9% | 17.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.4% | 17.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Denmark and Ugandans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Denmark are Puget Sound Salish (20.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Portuguese (20.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.28%), Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Norwegian (20.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Norway (20.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Northern European (20.8%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |