American vs Ugandan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
American
Ugandan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Americans
Ugandans
24.5%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
293rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
64.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
American vs Ugandan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 559,828,526 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Americans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.639 and weighted average of 24.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,803,349 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 20.8%, a difference of 17.7%.
![American vs Ugandan Single Female Poverty](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/single-female-poverty/americans-vs-ugandans-single-female-poverty-chart.webp)
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | American | Ugandan |
Minimum | 6.2% | 5.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 93.8% | 94.5% |
Mean | 39.7% | 23.7% |
Median | 33.3% | 20.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 27.3% | 16.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 42.3% | 25.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.0% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.8% | 17.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.7% | 17.2% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Americans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Americans are Alsatian (24.5%, a difference of 0.080%), French American Indian (24.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Osage (24.4%, a difference of 0.44%), Hispanic or Latino (24.6%, a difference of 0.49%), and African (24.8%, a difference of 0.98%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 24.2% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 24.3% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 24.4% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 24.5% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 24.5% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 24.6% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 24.6% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 24.8% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 24.8% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 24.9% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 25.0% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 25.1% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Norwegian (20.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Norway (20.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |