Immigrants from Norway vs Ugandan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Norway
Ugandan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Norway
Ugandans
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
63.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
64.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Norway vs Ugandan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,651,083 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.323 and weighted average of 20.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,803,349 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 20.8%, a difference of 0.070%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Norway | Ugandan |
Minimum | 9.8% | 5.5% |
Maximum | 65.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 55.4% | 94.5% |
Mean | 25.7% | 23.7% |
Median | 21.2% | 20.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.7% | 16.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.3% | 25.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.8% | 17.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.4% | 17.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway and Ugandans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Norwegian (20.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.32%), and Northern European (20.8%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Norwegian (20.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Northern European (20.8%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |