Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Immigrants from Australia Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,936,047 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.234 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,813,318 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.370 and weighted average of 4.4%, a difference of 11.7%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac	Immigrants from Australia
Minimum	0.54%	1.3%
Maximum	11.2%	23.4%
Range	10.6%	22.1%
Mean	4.3%	6.0%
Median	4.1%	4.3%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	2.8%	3.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	5.2%	6.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.4%	2.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.0%	5.4%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.0%	5.3%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs are Immigrants from Hungary (4.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Samoan (4.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Kenya (4.9%, a difference of 0.29%), Puget Sound Salish (4.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (4.9%, a difference of 0.37%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Palestinians	91.2 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 4.9%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	90.7 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 4.9%
Soviet Union	90.7 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 4.9%
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	90.5 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 4.9%
Puget Sound Salish	90.4 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 4.9%
Immigrants \| Kenya	90.2 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 4.9%
Samoans	90.2 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 4.9%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	89.4 /100 \| #135	Excellent 4.9%
Immigrants \| Hungary	88.7 /100 \| #136	Excellent 4.9%
Guamanians/Chamorros	86.5 /100 \| #137	Excellent 4.9%
Chileans	86.0 /100 \| #138	Excellent 4.9%
German Russians	85.1 /100 \| #139	Excellent 5.0%
Immigrants \| Portugal	84.8 /100 \| #140	Excellent 5.0%
Immigrants \| Brazil	84.6 /100 \| #141	Excellent 5.0%
Immigrants \| China	84.6 /100 \| #142	Excellent 5.0%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Okinawan (4.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Tlingit-Haida (4.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Sweden (4.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (4.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and Czechoslovakian (4.4%, a difference of 0.74%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
French	99.7 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	99.7 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	99.7 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 4.3%
Czechoslovakians	99.7 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Sweden	99.6 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 4.4%
Tlingit-Haida	99.6 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 4.4%
Okinawans	99.6 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Australia	99.6 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.6 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	99.5 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 4.4%
Macedonians	99.4 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Serbia	99.4 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Canada	99.4 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 4.4%
Slavs	99.4 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 4.4%
New Zealanders	99.4 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 4.4%