African vs Chinese Married-couple Households
COMPARE
African
Chinese
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Africans
Chinese
40.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
50.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
African vs Chinese Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,585,166 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Africans and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071 and weighted average of 40.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,742 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128 and weighted average of 50.4%, a difference of 23.0%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | African | Chinese |
| Minimum | 12.5% | 35.3% |
| Maximum | 72.3% | 63.0% |
| Range | 59.8% | 27.8% |
| Mean | 36.0% | 50.6% |
| Median | 36.7% | 51.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 31.1% | 46.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 39.9% | 56.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 9.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Africans by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Africans are Immigrants from Haiti (40.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Colville (41.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Jamaican (40.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (40.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Caribbean (40.8%, a difference of 0.40%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 41.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 41.4% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 41.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 41.4% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 41.2% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 41.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 41.0% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 40.9% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 40.9% |
| Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 40.9% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 40.9% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 40.8% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 40.7% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 40.7% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 40.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Pennsylvania German (50.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Pakistan (50.1%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (50.6%, a difference of 0.55%), Swiss (49.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and Immigrants from Korea (49.9%, a difference of 0.98%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 51.9% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 51.8% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 51.6% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 51.1% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 51.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 50.6% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 50.4% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 50.4% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 50.1% |
| Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 49.9% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 49.9% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 49.8% |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 49.7% |
| Swedes | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 49.7% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 49.6% |