African vs Chinese In Labor Force | Age 16-19
COMPARE
African
Chinese
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Comparison
Africans
Chinese
38.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
38.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
98.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
African vs Chinese In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 469,169,744 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Africans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.338 and weighted average of 38.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,804,450 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.268 and weighted average of 38.6%, a difference of 1.6%.
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | African | Chinese |
| Minimum | 19.0% | 12.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 75.9% |
| Range | 81.0% | 63.1% |
| Mean | 46.7% | 40.5% |
| Median | 41.8% | 39.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 37.8% | 35.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 52.9% | 42.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.1% | 7.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.6% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.5% | 10.4% |
Demographics Similar to Africans and Chinese by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Africans are Immigrants from Africa (38.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from England (38.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Seminole (38.1%, a difference of 0.34%), Guamanian/Chamorro (38.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and Ethiopian (38.2%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Delaware (38.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (38.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Lebanese (38.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Maltese (38.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Crow (38.5%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
| Delaware | 98.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 38.6% |
| Chinese | 98.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 38.6% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 98.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 38.6% |
| Lebanese | 98.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 38.6% |
| Maltese | 98.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 38.5% |
| Crow | 98.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 38.5% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 98.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 38.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 98.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 38.4% |
| Hawaiians | 98.2 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 38.4% |
| Bulgarians | 97.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 38.3% |
| Colville | 97.9 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 38.3% |
| Chickasaw | 97.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 38.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 97.8 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 38.3% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 97.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 38.3% |
| Ukrainians | 97.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 38.3% |
| Ethiopians | 97.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 38.2% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 97.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 38.2% |
| Seminole | 96.7 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 38.1% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 38.1% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 96.1 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 38.0% |
| Africans | 95.6 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 38.0% |