Turkish vs Lithuanian In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Turkish
 Lithuanian
 In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Comparison
Turks
Lithuanians
80.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
80.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
65th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Lithuanian In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,859,072 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.241 and weighted average of 80.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,962,111 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.155 and weighted average of 80.2%, a difference of 0.11%.
 
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Lithuanian | 
| Minimum | 53.3% | 45.0% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 46.7% | 55.0% | 
| Mean | 79.0% | 77.7% | 
| Median | 80.6% | 80.0% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 77.4% | 73.7% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 81.5% | 82.0% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 8.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 9.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 9.5% | 
Demographics Similar to Turks and Lithuanians by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Sri Lanka (80.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Peru (80.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Peruvian (80.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Sudan (80.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Cabo Verde (80.3%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Macedonian (80.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Korea (80.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Albania (80.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Taiwanese (80.2%, a difference of 0.010%), and Carpatho Rusyn (80.3%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | 
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.5 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 80.4% | 
| Immigrants | Greece | 99.4 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 80.4% | 
| Immigrants | Sudan | 99.4 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 80.4% | 
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.3 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 80.4% | 
| Turks | 99.2 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 80.3% | 
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.2 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 80.3% | 
| Peruvians | 99.1 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 80.3% | 
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 99.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 80.3% | 
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 80.3% | 
| Afghans | 98.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 80.3% | 
| Serbians | 98.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 80.3% | 
| Swedes | 98.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 80.3% | 
| Tongans | 98.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 80.3% | 
| Burmese | 98.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 80.3% | 
| Carpatho Rusyns | 98.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 80.3% | 
| Immigrants | Korea | 98.8 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 80.3% | 
| Immigrants | Albania | 98.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 80.3% | 
| Lithuanians | 98.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 80.2% | 
| Macedonians | 98.7 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 80.2% | 
| Taiwanese | 98.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 80.2% | 
| Bhutanese | 98.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 80.2% |