Ugandan vs Chickasaw Family Households
COMPARE
Ugandan
Chickasaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Ugandans
Chickasaw
61.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Chickasaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,998,948 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029 and weighted average of 61.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 4.4%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ugandan | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 43.1% | 40.0% |
Maximum | 82.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 39.5% | 60.0% |
Mean | 63.6% | 67.1% |
Median | 63.1% | 67.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 56.7% | 62.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.8% | 72.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.1% | 10.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.7% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Ugandans by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Alsatian (61.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Cape Verdean (61.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Serbia (61.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Tlingit-Haida (61.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from West Indies (61.6%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 61.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 61.6% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.6% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 61.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 61.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |