Immigrants from Africa vs Chickasaw Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Africa
Chickasaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Africa
Chickasaw
62.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
300th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
61.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Africa vs Chickasaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 468,955,500 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.009 and weighted average of 62.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,674,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 64.4%, a difference of 3.2%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Africa | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 28.7% | 40.0% |
Maximum | 96.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 67.3% | 60.0% |
Mean | 62.4% | 67.1% |
Median | 62.5% | 67.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 59.1% | 62.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.2% | 72.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 10.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.2% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 8.8% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Africa by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are Immigrants from Kuwait (62.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Albania (62.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kenya (62.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Spain (62.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and French American Indian (62.4%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Sweden | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 62.5% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 62.5% |
Okinawans | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 62.5% |
Slovenes | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 62.4% |
French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 62.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 62.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 62.4% |
Immigrants | Africa | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 62.4% |
Immigrants | Albania | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 62.4% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 62.3% |
Cree | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 62.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 62.2% |
Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are British (64.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from England (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nigeria (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (64.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Scotch-Irish (64.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Czechs | 67.0 /100 | #156 | Good 64.5% |
Canadians | 66.6 /100 | #157 | Good 64.4% |
Lebanese | 66.4 /100 | #158 | Good 64.4% |
Germans | 65.8 /100 | #159 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 65.2 /100 | #160 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | England | 62.6 /100 | #161 | Good 64.4% |
British | 61.6 /100 | #162 | Good 64.4% |
Chickasaw | 61.5 /100 | #163 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 60.1 /100 | #164 | Good 64.4% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 60.0 /100 | #165 | Good 64.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 59.2 /100 | #166 | Average 64.4% |
Irish | 57.9 /100 | #167 | Average 64.4% |
Hondurans | 57.5 /100 | #168 | Average 64.4% |
Iraqis | 56.0 /100 | #169 | Average 64.4% |
Armenians | 55.9 /100 | #170 | Average 64.4% |